剑桥雅思14写作范文1
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients,all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
剑桥雅思14写作范文2
Task Response
1. 文章全面回答了题目中的问题。第一段没有像我们平日里所见的文章那样，先介绍背景，而是直接就动物灭绝的观点展开讨论，并延续到第二段。第三段和四段则分别列举了两个动物灭绝之外的问题：气候变化和塑料垃圾，并指出它们危害的严重性。
从这篇范文中我们可以看出，雅思写作所谓的结构确实存在，但并不是说必须按照规定好的结构来。只要可以言之成理就好。
Coherence and Cohesion
1. 文章整体逻辑结构完整。第一段论述动物保护的观点，第二段承接上文并引出其他危害。第三段介绍气候变化，第四段介绍塑料危害，最后一段总结。
2. 文章主要使用逻辑连接的方式（即一句话的开头或者主语承接上一句话中已经出现过的成分）使行文流畅、通顺、自然。
Lexical Resource
文章用词十分灵活，涉及范围也很广。具体内容可以参考下面“高分词汇短语”板块。
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
1. 作为雅思官方给出的范文，这篇文章肯定不存在任何语法错误。
2. 这篇文章使用了各种各样的复杂句，从开头算起，出现了：宾语从句，时间状语从句，让步状语从句，whether引导的主语从句，限定性定语从句，条件状语从句等。
剑桥雅思14写作范文3
本题中的饼图说明了美国人在日常的几餐中(早、中、晚、零食)对三类营养物质——钠、饱和脂肪、摄入的糖—一的平均摄入量。
首先,我们来看每个饼图中的早餐和午餐部分。这三类营养物质(在每餐中)的摄入比例似乎差不多。早餐中有14%的钠、16%的饱和脂肪、及16%的摄入的糖,而午餐中这三类的比例分别是29%、26%和19%。
接下来再看另外两餐,我们可以很清楚地看到它们的差別较大。晚餐中三类物质的比例从43%到23%不等,而零食中的含量正好相反,从14%至42%不等。总之,从以上图中可以看出,晚餐是吃得最不健康的,零食紧随其后。而早餐是吃得最健康的,午餐居中。
剑桥雅思14test1小作文以及参考范文就介绍完了，大家在看参考的作文的时候不能只背，需要了解该作文的逻辑、写作思路，以及一些好句子、好语法，这样才能实打实的帮助你提高雅思作文水平、
剑桥雅思14写作范文4
attempt n. 尝试
rare or dying species 稀少或者正在灭绝的动物
breeding programmes 繁殖项目
genuine sadness 真实的悲伤
ruthlessly adv. 无情地，冷酷地
poaching n. 偷猎
debatable adj. 有争议的。
excessive adj. 过度的。
call for 呼吁
urgent action 立刻行动
halt v. 暂停，停止
reverse v. 扭转
discard v. 丢弃，抛弃
gruesome adj. 恐怖的，可怕的
ingest v. 摄入
food chain n. 食物链
cause for regret 后悔的原因
剑桥雅思14写作范文5
Some people consider that the loss of individual species of plants and animals is the main environmental problem of our time. Attempts to preserve rare or dying species are carried out in zoos or other specialist plant and animal facilities, through breeding programmes, preservation orders and other forms of protection and there was genuine sadness among many when the last surviving white rhino died earlier this year.
Survival of the fittest is nature’s way of ruthlessly allowing weaker specimens to die out, although mankind has also contributed to falling animal numbers through hunting and poaching. However, whether saving individual species should be the main focus of environmental protection is debatable. Climate change and excessive use of plastic are just two other major problems that deserve our attention.
The evidence of climate change is there for us all to see: rising sea levels and associated flooding with the loss of homes at low land levels are becoming more frequent. Many countries and island communities are now calling for urgent action to delay, halt or even reverse the process, although if we believe the experts, reversal is impossible. Habitable areas are gradually shrinking, often for some of the poorest groups of people but there seems to be little obvious action taking place. If the major contributors to climate change will not support the reduction of greenhouse gases, there is little hope for the future.
Naturalists have also begun to expose the serious problem arising from discarded plastic waste. Birds and animals can die gruesome deaths through being trapped or caught up in plastic bags or ropes, while the long process required for these plastics to decay means that they remain a threat for many years to come. Worse, there is now beginning to be evidence of sea creatures ingesting smaller globules of disintegrating plastic, which harms them and all the other creatures in their particular food chain.
The loss of particular species, both flora and fauna, is cause for regret, but I do not agree that they are the most important environmental problems these days. If climate change and damage from plastic continue, there will be less land and less food for everyone including plants and animals.
