影评范文英语1
镜头运用
蒙太奇
蒙太奇原为建筑学术语，意为构成、装配。现在是影视专业术语，是一种剪辑技巧，一般包括画面剪辑和画面合成两方面。运用蒙太奇能丰富电影艺术的表现力，使表现内容主次分明，达到高度的概括和集中;还能够规范和引导观众的情绪和心理，启迪观众思考;还可以实现对时空的再造，形成独特的影视时空。
评论方法
电影评论的可评之处，可以就其导演的独特构思、声音画面、蕴含的深刻道理、影片的时代意义、影视音乐、电影内容、电影灯光照明、电影的拍摄技巧、电影中的角色等都可以进行评论，评论过程通过结合影片具体内容和影片在构思、结构、技术、人物等方面最为闪亮之处摆出自己的观点，从而近一步论证。
要写好一片影评，首先应当认真观看电影，并记录影片中重要的人物、镜头等方面，找出影片中最为亮点以及最新颖之处。一篇影评能否吸引人就在其于有没有不同于别人的观点，写出别人一般想不到的内容，可以用两个字总结“新”“奇”。
影评范文英语2
这是一部典型的韩国片，不需要大场景，基本上是一条街道，一个房间，一张床就能完成所有的的描述。短暂的爱情一直是韩国电影的偏好，有描述婚前遇到真爱的，有描述爱上妹妹的未婚夫的，也有描述婚后与爱人保持关系的，抑或是死前遇到真爱的，这一部也不例外。汤唯小姐之所以符合韩国电影的气质，是因为即使不说话，她也一直散发出一种隐忍的韧性，符合她是一个有故事的人的定位。
故事有几个亮点。
第一，在游乐场，汤唯和玄彬模仿一对争执的情侣的对话。直到那对情侣像走在滚动条上的追逐开始，最后他们相互拥抱升上天空直至不见，影片带入了魔幻的色彩。
第二，在餐馆，聪慧的玄彬看出了王晶对汤唯的想法，随后与其争执。当人们问他为什么打架时，他说王晶用了他的叉子不道歉。看似很荒唐的理由，可以理解为玄彬随意戏弄，也可以看做是影片想要影射的意图。当年初恋男友王晶跑来提出要和汤唯私奔，被其夫发现，汤唯被打昏后醒来杀死其夫，王晶最后却没有如约而至。通过玄彬的嘴道出汤唯的委屈――为什么在自己有妻儿的情况下去打扰她的生活。
第三，离别前玄彬和汤唯长达半分钟的激吻。
最后，汤唯从^v^出来，坐在约定地方门等待玄彬，咖啡馆的门开了，汤唯往门口瞅了一眼，表情中没有惊喜，但是她开始自言自语：嗨，好久不见。
我的情绪是从玄彬三次在车外凝望汤唯和她道别开始的，因为那样的眼神我再熟悉不过。()和千里迢迢外的他见面，每次都觉得是最后一次，明知道是没有结局的爱情，但是总要一次又一次去奔波、去尝试，不是我送他，就是他送我。火车站、机场、长途汽车站，每一次都是以这样的眼神目送。我不知道人们为什么会迷恋这些没有结局的爱情，仿佛没有结局才能一直永恒下去。
以前看过一部韩国电影，名字忘记了，未婚妻婚前遇到一个男人，发生了N夜情，她迷恋这种飞蛾扑火的感觉，甚至头脑一热想要和他永远在一起。直到，她和这个男人坐在小酒馆里，男人点了餐，并交代师傅酒要加热，因为这个女人不喜欢喝凉的，女人才顿悟，于是离开了这个男人，她走的时候说，如果你没让师傅加热我可能就不结婚和你在一起了。为什么？因为那些没有结局的短暂爱情并不包括生活中的柴米油盐，如果有了细致生活中的种种考量，那么这个男人就会变成第二个未婚夫，那么他和他又有什么区别呢？
所以，那些没有结局的爱情，是多巴胺的泛滥，是对于残缺的矫情。因为没有结局，也不长久，所以要争分夺秒，每个小时甚至每一分钟都要掀起情绪的高潮。
现在想起来，曾经对于那些没有结局的爱情的迷恋，简直是对自己的一种迫害。
影评范文英语3
英文电影影评
――勇敢传说英文影评
“Brave” is the latest animated film from Pixar, and therefore becomes the film the parents of the world will be dragged to by their kids. The good news is that the kids will probably love it, and the bad news is that parents will be disappointed if they're hoping for another Pixar groundbreaker. Unlike such brightly original films as “Toy Story,” “Finding Nemo,” “WALL-E” and “Up,” this one finds Pixar poaching on traditional territory of Disney, its corporate partner. We get a spunky princess; her mum, the queen; her dad, the gruff king, an old witch who lives in the woods, and so on.
The princess is Merida （voice of Kelly Macdonald）， seen in an action-packed prologue as a flame-haired Scottish tomboy whose life is changed by an early birthday gift of a bow, which quickly inspires her to become the best archer in the kingdom. Then we flash forward to Merida as a young lady of marriageable age, who is startled by request from Queen Elinor （Emma Thompson） to choose among three possible husbands chosen by her clan.
Nothing doing, especially since all three candidates are doofuses. Merida leaps upon her trusty steed and flees into the forest, where her friends the will-o-the-wisps lead her to the cottage of a gnarled old witch （Julie Walters）。 She begs for a magic spell that will change Queen Elinor's mind, but it changes more than that: It turns Elinor into a bear. Witches never know how to stop when they're ahead.
Luckily, the magic spell comes with an escape clause. Merida has exactly two days to reverse the charm. After she and her mother absorb what has happened, they begin to work together and grow closer than ever, even though the queen cannot speak. There is a tricky complication. King Fergus （Billy Connolly） had his leg bitten off by a bear （in the prologue）， and has been indisposed toward them ever since. Unsurprisingly, when he sees his wife as a bear, he fails to recognize her.
And so on. This is a great-looking movie, much enlivened by the inspiration of giving Merida three small brothers, little redheaded triplets. The Scottish Highlands are thrillingly painted in astonishing detail, and some action shows Merida's archery more than equal in assorted emergencies.
“Brave” has an uplifting message about improving communication between mothers and daughters, although transforming your mom into a bear is a rather extreme first step. Elinor is a good sport, under the circumstances. But Merida is far from being a typical fairy-tale princess. Having flatly rejected the three suitors proposed by her family, she is apparently prepared to go through life quite happily without a husband, and we can imagine her in later years, a weathered and indomitable Amazon queen, sort of a Boudica for the Scots. “Brave” seems at a loss to deal with her as a girl and makes her a sort of honorary boy.
影评范文英语4
看完管虎导演的《斗牛》，让人不由自主的想起了余华的那部作品《活着》，不论是一直处于贫困的牛二还是曾经有过美好时代的富贵，最后的结局都回归到了简单的人和牛。
影片中生与死对于牛二来说可谓是家常便饭，但牛二顽强的生命力仿佛让其成为了打不死的小强，牛二身上所表现的出是中国农民身上所特有的那种吃苦耐劳，顽强的生命力，以^v^为时代背景的电影讲述，对普通农民的生活来说，日寇、流民、土匪、八路、^v^，乃至日后的解放军，都成了过眼云烟，在最朴素的生存理念的支配下，农民卑微而又坚韧的活着，“城头变幻的大王旗”永远无法遮蔽农民自己的那一亩三分地；最后，他们还用最质朴的契约理念无情嘲笑了所谓的宏大价值，《斗牛》用小农意识曲径通幽的玩了一把市民理念的宣泄。最后当牛二（黄渤）拉着他的牛坐在土坡上感叹年华的流逝时，如同是了余华在《活着》里描写的那个老农和他的那头牛的一个翻版。
一个少爷混混，历尽人生坎坷跌宕起伏生离死别，到老唯有黄牛相伴，孤苦伶仃，可无论如何，他活着。一个乡村浑小子，阴差阳错为了一头牛而疲于奔命九死一生，最终和牛相依为命归隐山中，他，也活着。葛优之《活着》，命运多舛，福祸相依，无可奈何。黄渤之《斗牛》，且喜且悲，似喜似悲，初喜终悲。一样的小字辈，一样的大背景，一样的人性的真实和生命的惨淡，当然，还有一样的，那就是无论如何，总要活下去。也有不同，富贵是为了活着而活着，一种在生命无常的境况下学会了适应的惯性的活着。而牛二，多了个由头，那就是信守一种承诺，尽管这承诺是被迫担上的，让人哭笑不得，可就是这农民的纯朴天性，在战乱的大背景下，给了他一次次死里逃生的机缘，也许，我们可以称之为信念。作为农民的他或许根本没意识，但至少，这成了电影得以黑色幽默的非常重要的线索：一头共产国际送给八路军用于补养伤员的奶牛，在鬼子扫荡之前被委托给村民牛二保护，签字画押后的一纸承诺，支撑着牛二经历了鬼子扫荡、难民乱相、土匪火并、^v^残兵，以及后来的解放军，尽管全村人都没了，尽管中间经历的各色人等也多死于非命，可牛二，和那头来自共产国际的奶牛，依然顽强地活着，这是电影的奇迹，可未尝不是奇迹的现实。？
原本可能非常沉重的主题，以如此淋漓尽致轻松活泼的方式演绎，使得黄渤能够在其原本幽默搞笑的本份上表现更深一些的内涵。在嘻笑怒骂阴差阳错中，生死显得如此简单，看似玩笑，却非玩笑。无论鬼子兵、难民，还是土匪，都在一点点可笑却不夸张中尽展人性的黑与白、冷与暖。甚至包括那头奶牛，导演以其高超的功力，让牲畜带有了人的性情，尽管不会说话，但一举一动，一个眼神，甚至一滴泪，都颇生动。奶牛卜一亮相，撞倒了围墙矗立在黄渤面前，那架势，是典型的黑色幽默就如同这让我想起《喀布尔快递》中那头驴子，可爱可笑加可气。奶牛和黄渤之间，演绎着一连串精彩的对手戏，最终相依为命，终老山中。
不得不提的还有阎妮，片中另一位主角，虽然给她的桥段不多，都是在倒叙中展现的，但她如此精彩地演绎了一位典型的乡村“泼妇”形象，嘻笑怒骂肆无忌惮，泼辣直爽充满活力，也许，这正代表着中国农村最古老却旺盛的生命力吧。牛二之于九儿（阎妮），牛二之于奶牛，粗糙而真实的乡村爱情，因了这永不止息的生命力，稀里糊涂却倔强坚定地活着。
从一些交错和闪回的镜头运用上，《斗牛》颇有点《疯狂的石头》的影子，但却没那么多线索，也不复杂，放在^v^乱世中，塑造了很多颇为真实的形象，并在风云际会中有对社会生活的颇多挖掘，这一点又比纯粹的商业喜剧高了个层次。但在主题上我看到的是“活着”，因为在我心里，《活着》是曾经一座很难逾越的丰碑，而现在，《斗牛》以更加精妙的叙述方式，在展现人最基本的生命意识上似乎也开启了一个新的里程碑。
从电影《斗牛》中看到的是欢笑之后的凄凉，看到了生存的艰难，看到了人世间如走马灯一样峰回路转的变迁。可最真实的依然真实，最纯朴的依然纯朴，最简单的依然简单，就如同黄渤在新闻发布会上说的那样他还活着，只不过他的活是拍戏，牛二的活着是为了生存。
只为一个承诺，也许很模糊，也许只是一种惯性，也许所有人都可能忘记，但他还记得，并且为此，活着。
影评范文英语5
某种意义上算是为短片看的原著了，虽然这样说其实并不太算是合适。
很早以前就曾看过一点，后来怎么也缓冲不完，也就算了。这次是因为课上老师要讲了，所以才又找出来要提前看过。也就在看之前先补了下原著，不长，但还是花了我两天时间(当然不是完整的)，昨天去图书馆借了一本古老破旧上面还有批注(我讨厌批注)的小薄本，刚刚才还。看的时候有时还真想到的是短片中的画面，虽然人物什么的整个的感觉并不像短片中的样子，但毕竟是先入为主了。说回上课要放的这件事，这短片还真是有名啊，虽然老师当成改编文学名著的重要作品，不过我最初还是当成一部优秀短片而已这样看的。又想起来，在这两次之前，还有一次高中的语文老师放了一点，不过那么长，后来同学觉得无聊，就也掐掉不放了。就原著来说，当然是更有名的作品，初中时就一直被让去看，但也一直没看，看介绍就觉得无聊了。真正看来，不比想象的好多少，也可能我之前受到太多影响了。心理描写很多，自言自语什么的，也许如果不是表现什么类似于人的精神意志，而是表现孤独，如果只是理解为一篇一个人在海上的小文也许我不会这样不喜欢它的，但是当成文学名著来看，实在太无聊了。
比起第一次看这个短片(那次也不能叫看了，毕竟只是看了点开头)，这次觉得出彩的地方少了，只是照抄而已，可能也和我没好好看有关系，一直是在一个小窗口放映，一边还在做别的事，又和人聊天。但应该主要还是因为看了原著，所以有的地方不觉得奇怪了，也不觉得有新鲜感，没什么可期待的，完全一样，后面都知道了。不过也确实是小说本身就很平淡，没有什么特别出乎意料的情节。
但是作为一部动画，画面确实很美，无可争议。水，光，人物，如果说皮克斯当时做《海底总动员》时是动画史上对于水的'一次突破，这部短片足以让皮克斯艳羡不已。(当然这不是一个概念，我知道他们不至去艳羡一部手绘动画的，但人家确实画得好~)给8分的时候想，这是给画面的，画面就足以撑住着8分了。忘了在哪听说，据说是画在玻璃上的，那确实是承袭了玻璃的这种晶莹透亮的感觉了。
另外，其实故事上也应该给些高的评价的，虽然我前面说它无聊。但是这与原著是有很大关系的，而这部短片其实正是我过去所希望的那种完全表现原著的故事。只是原著没那么喜欢而已，所以其实总的讲还真是好短片。
只是短片的画面过于优美其实也不同于我所以为的原著的感觉了，不过，倒也无所谓了，既然都是抓不到原作感觉的，那好看的当然强于难看的。
音乐，没觉得有特别出彩，但水的声音，鸟的声音，自然的声音还是很迷人的，在鲨鱼出现前还有一个配合着画面暗下来的提示。总体还不错。
影评范文英语6
和老人在一起的，是一群尊敬他，但永远不能理解他的打渔人。
他是个经验丰富、富于冒险的古巴渔民。他因倔强而古怪。他骄傲，自信，永不认输。虽然苍老，却依然强健有力，有坚持到底的毅力。面对命运，尽管失败，他保持了人的尊严与荣耀，有着胜利者的风度。而最后当战斗已成往事，他却已完全超越了这个自然，超越了他人生中的磨难、辉煌、成功与失败。他有着“重压下的优雅风度”。
“人并不是生来要给打败的，你尽可以把它消灭掉，可就是打不败他。”
如果说鲨鱼为命运，大海为社会，狮子为力与勇的象征，是老人追求的搏击精神，那么马林鱼则为理想。与惊慌，疯狂，绝望，急促的鱼群相比，那条大鱼姿态优美，冷静，高贵，强壮，美丽，尊严，无所畏惧，信心十足。
海明威曾经说过：“我宁可有一个诚实的敌人，也不愿拥有很多虚伪的朋友。”所有鲨鱼中，只有鲭鲨无所畏惧，为所欲为，不肯认输;漂亮，高贵，残忍，能干。
小男孩是人类的未来，也是硬汉子不向命运低头的力量源泉。他要学会老人的一切本领，精神力量将代代相传。
而海滩上那具白色的马林鱼骨，作为老人与马林鱼激烈追逐，与鲨鱼拼死相争的见证，既是胜利的象征，也是失败的象征，依附其上的是海明威式的硬汉子精神。
这就是八分之一的冰山原则。
影评范文英语7
英文影评范文精选15篇
如何写影评？影评怎么写？
如何写影评？影评怎么写？对入门者只有一个条件，即：爱看电影。
想写影评么？^v^你的兴趣是最重要的向导^v^。没有天赋？没关系，记忆力乃至电影观察力都是可以训练的。记笔记就是一个有效的方法。缺乏经验？不要紧，^v^研究能力是可以习得的^v^。怎样开头？^v^在影片中发现问题^v^。发现不了问题咋办？而我又不好意思询问别人。那就^v^养成自问的习惯^v^。怎样才能发现问题呢？^v^在讨论任何形式的电影叙事时，首先要对古典叙事形式保持敏感^v^。也就是说，要把^v^美国电影作为终极范式^v^，在比较与对照中去发现特定影片与之不同的创作旨趣及手法。^v^一旦学会辨认古典叙事，你就会更加了解叙事的多样性^v^。
写影评，应该把握好这样几点：捕捉住感受点。一部电影涉及的方面很广，需要品评的着笔点很多。这就需要对电影反复回味思考，用心灵再度感受，把握往影片中最能动人的地方，并使之在自己的笔下得到理性的升华。
立意要新，开掘要深。写影评要有新意，要有独到的见解，抓往要点，自感而发。要做到有新意，一是要抓住影片内容，结合台社会现买；二是要准确把握住影片的精神实质，挖掘影片本身所包含的深刻内涵。例如对张艺谋电影的分析要紧扣住时代背景，但也不必要都从思想意义角度分析，如巩俐在张艺谋电影中的形象塑造，张艺谋电影中的男性形象等，都是可以开掘的领域。
要重视影片的艺术分析。电影是通过艺术手段来表现主题、塑造人物、抒发感情的，所以影评要重视对影片艺术的高下进行分析。这种分析应具体详细，由表及里，言之有物；评价则应观点鲜明，实事求是。在艺术评析中，字里行间渗透出电影意识，尽可能恰当地运用电影艺术名词术语，还需要有对电影艺术的深刻感受与理性把握。这可以通过阅读电影理论书籍和多欣赏优秀影片来解决。每年的美国奥斯卡电影大奖评选，世界各国的影展都给我们提供了这样的机会，虽不能亲临其境，但通过多种媒体一样能了解动态，捕捉到世界电影发展的最新信息。
影评写作可以有长有短，可着眼于一部影片的一个镜头，也可以着眼于一种电影现象。对于我们师范生来说，要对一部影片作出全面的评价比较困难，练习写影评，可从评论一个人物形象、一个情节、一个场面入手，可对演员演技。
拍摄技巧、导演意图、影片风格、色彩、语言、音乐等进行单一的评析。随着写影评水平的提高，就可对某一人物形象，如影片中的学生、教师、军人等银幕形象发表看法，也可以从纵向谈某一阶段电影的回顾或某一体裁电影的回顾，分析其得失；或从横向谈某一风格的电影，如西部电影、贺岁片、娱乐片等，或横纵向结合，谈一个导演的风格，如谢晋模式、张艺谋现象等到。初涉影评写作不宜贪大求全，而应从一点一滴写起，思考挖掘，连缀成篇。
开始练习写作影评时还应该注意：语言要朴实，要个性化。写影评一定要讲真话，讲自己的话，不要抄袭别人的评论。唯独自己的感受和朴实的语言，才会使自己的评论富有个性和新意，也才会给读者带来清新的感受。
叙议要结合，突出评论。电影最直观可感的，影评离不开叙事。但切忌过多地叙述故事，要突出分析写评价。当然，所评所析不得脱离影片孤立地进行。
设计好影评的标题至关重要。一般来说，它由正副标题构成。正题——揭示文章的中心，必须简明扼要，而又耐人寻味，能够引起读者的阅读兴趣，同时也能给读者带来审美愉悦，它是贯穿全文的主线；副题——点明评论对象，交待片名或评论角度，它是正题必要的补充。二者相得益彰，能使文章增色不少。如：《历史和时代的搏击者——评银幕上的^v^员形象》，《悲剧在红色中渗透——评电影＜红高梁＞》。
我们在写影评的过程中，要不断总结学习他人的写作经验，丰富自己的写作实践，在日积月累的基础上，通过影评的写作，不断促进我们知识结何的完善，提高我们的颀赏水平和审美能力。
How to Write a Movie Review
Writing a movie review is a great way of expressing your opinion of a movie. The purpose of most movie reviews is to help the reader in determining whether they want to watch, rent or buy the movie. The review should give enough details about the movie that the reader can make an informed decision, without giving anyway any essentials such as the plot or any surprises. Below are our guidelines and tips for writing a good movie review.
Submit your movie review
1. Watch the movie
The first step in writing the review is to watch the movie. Watch the movie in a relaxed environment you are familiar with. You do not want to be distracted by an unfamiliar room. Watching the movie a second time will help you absorb a lot more detail about the movie. Most movie reviewers take notes as they watch the movie review.
2. Give your opinion
Most movie reviewers will give their opinion of the movie. This is important as
the reviewer can express the elements of the movie they enjoyed or disliked.
However, as in all good journalism, the reviewer should also give impartial details, and allow the reader to make their own mind over an issue the reader liked or disliked. Opinions should be explained to allow the reader to determine whether they would agree with your opinion .
Many regular movie reviewers will develop a following. If one can find a reviewer who shares a similar taste in films, one can confidently follow the reviewers recommendations.
3. Who is your audience?
You need to consider who your likely readers are. Writing a movie review for children requires a different approach than if writing for a movie club. Ensure you report on the factors that matter to your likely audience.
4. Give an outline
Give the outline of the movie, but don't give away essential details such as the end or any surprises. If there is a big surprise you want to entice readers by telling them something special happens, just don't say what.
5. Actors （演员）
If the movie contains actors, as most do, detail who is starring in the movie and how well you think they acted.
6. Structure
Did the movie follow a regular predictable story line, or did it get you thinking like a Quentin Tarantino movie?
and lighting （电影艺术和灯光效果）
Give details about how well the movie was shot and directed. Was the lighting good in the moody scenes?
8. Music
Did the movie have its own score like Koyaanisqatsi or ET, or did it feature songs from popular artists?
9. Read, read and read
Read and check your review thoroughly. It can be embarrassing to find errors in your work after it has been published. This is especially important for reviews that will be published on the Internet, as search engines are always looking for the correct spellings of key words.
Submit your movie review
英文电影影评范文
侏罗纪公园3英文影评 Jurassic Park III(20_
^v^Jurassic Park III^v^ is neither as dreadful as it might be, nor as perfectly wrought as it could be. For one thing, it moves along as jauntily as one of those horrific raptors scooting along the plain; the movie wraps itself up so quickly, and after such a relatively low-key climax, that you can barely believe it's over. It runs about 90 minutes, and that's sweet relief. You can get your fix of dino effects (most of which are starting to look pretty familiar anyway, after the original ^v^Jurassic Park^v^ and ^v^The Lost World: Jurassic Park^v^), with a few good jokes and interesting performances thrown in, and be on your way.
One of the best things about ^v^Jurassic Park III^v^ is that it brings back Sam Neill, who starred in the original, and he's a distinctly human and humane presence. As the movie opens, we see Neill's adventuresome paleontologist, Dr. Alan Grant, playing with the toddler of his former collaborator Dr. Ellie Satler (Laura Dern, in a nicely played cameo), who has settled down with an earnest, unexciting husband and is quietly raising their two kids. Neill plays the scene
beautifully: He's half puzzled by the idea that anybody would want to settle down to a life like this, and half wistfully jealous that it's just not for him.
He has no desire to see any more live dinosaurs up close and personal. Nonetheless, he and his young assistant Billy (Alessandro Nivola) are reluctantly roped into an adventure expedition to Isla Sorna (the ^v^Site II^v^ from ^v^The Lost World,^v^ where the prehistoric horrors were bred in a flagrant expression of human arrogance), by Amanda and Paul Kirby (Téa Leoni and William H. Macy), a rich couple hankering for danger.
Of course, they have another motive. But the bare-bones plot, from a script written by Peter Buchman, Alexander Payne (writer and director of ^v^Election^v^ and ^v^Citizen Ruth^v^) and Jim Taylor (who co-wrote those pictures with Payne), is probably the last reason anybody would go to see it. What most of us want are dinosaurs, and there are just the right number of those here, from a flock of fierce pterodactyl-like pteranodons with mischievously knowing eyes, to the dreaded raptors (who always look to me as if they should be dangling old-lady pocketbooks from their disproportionately smallish, curled-over front claws). Although it's probably still too intense for very small children, ^v^Jurassic Park III^v^ features a blessed minimum of torso chewing. The worst part is watching one of the raptors use a giant toenail to puncture the spine of a minor character played by Michael Jeter -- he's too fine an actor to meet such a ignominious end. Another saving grace of ^v^Jurassic Park III^v^ is that it captures some of the wonder from the first picture. Director Joe Johnston (^v^Honey, I Shrunk the Kids,^v^ ^v^Jumanji^v^) is much more
low-key than his predecessor Steven Spielberg, who directed the first two pictures in the series. Thankfully, he's out to set us rambling and bumping on a scary-funny amusement park ride; he doesn't hammer on the whiskery old theme of man-playing-God, nor does he seem to take much pleasure in the requisite bloody chomping, even though he of course has to include some of it. And he offers us one extraordinary panorama that looks as if it had been lifted straight out of those softly colored educational picture books of the '50s and '60s, a group of peaceful
vegetarian apatosauruses against a purply pink Maxfield Parrish sky on the banks of a canal, chomping placidly on the plants they so love to eat. Dr. Grant and his group view the scene as they pass by it on a barge, and Neill plays the moment perfectly, like a man deep in love. It's as if a sight like this could make up for any number of dreadful dinosaur encounters.
The other actors here are just as game. As Eric, a kid who's been stranded on the island, Trevor Morgan shows the kind of appealing resourcefulness that's always fun for kids to watch. Macy is more than serviceable in a throwaway role: He manages to give his cowardly-lion character a great deal of charm and comic texture. Leoni does the best she can with her
character, but there's not much to work with: She doesn't get a chance to use her best gift, a flair for snappy, screwball-comedy timing that sparkled in her short-lived TV show ^v^The Naked Truth.^v^
Even so, Payne, Buchman and Taylor give us plenty of little things to laugh at along the way: Dr. Grant and Eric have a pleasingly tossed-off exchange as Grant incredulously holds up a bottle of T. Rex pee that Eric has collected. ^v^How did you get this?^v^ he demands. ^v^You don't wanna know,^v^ Eric deadpans ruefully. There are a few moments in the picture that are streaked with a sense of terror, scenes where you think the absolute worst is going to happen. But it never quite does. There's a surprisingly delicate touch at work in ^v^Jurassic Park III,^v^ and the movie is marbled through with strands of acerbic wit. You might think that a filmmaker's going to that much trouble in a ^v^Jurassic Park^v^ picture is like casting pearls before swine. What chance do pearls have under the feet of prehistoric giants? Miraculously, they survive the trampling intact, and they're what you remember long after the last mighty footstep resonates.
II．电影名称：
1. 第六周 《当幸福来敲门》 The Pursuit of Hapiness
导演：加布里尔·穆奇诺
上映日期：20_年12月15日
北美票房：163,566,459美元
首周票房：26,541,709美元
发行公司：索尼
票房成绩：威尔·史密斯第一次征战圣诞档就大胜而归，成本仅5500万美元的
《当幸福来敲门》的首周票房只有2654万，但此后越战越勇，最终
在《博物馆之夜》这些大制作影片的夹缝中擒回亿美元，证明
史密斯不愧是好莱坞第一人。而在海外市场，这部影片也大有王者
风范，亿的总票房在全球票房榜的名列第13位。
评论：《当幸福来敲门》是威尔·史密斯迄今为止口碑最佳的影片，IMDB评
分高达分。影评人对这部影片也不吝赞美之词。《旧金山纪事报》的米克·拉塞尔评论说：“这部影片带来的最大惊喜是，它并不粗糙，非常诚实不做作。”《纽约时报》的麦诺拉·达吉斯则写道：“这部影片是现实世界的童话，史密斯和他儿子的表演压倒了一切。”《滚石》杂志的彼得·特拉维斯说：“史密斯正在走向奥斯卡，他的这个角色需要把严谨、聪明、魅力、幽默和热情合二为一，他做到了这一点。”果
英文影评范文精选15篇
How to Write a Movie Review
Writing a movie review is a great way of expressing your opinion of a movie. The purpose of most movie reviews is to help the reader in determining whether they want to watch, rent or buy the movie. The review should give enough details about the movie that the reader can make an informed decision, without giving anyway any essentials such as the plot or any surprises. Below are our guidelines and tips for writing a good movie review.
Submit your movie review英文影评范文精选15篇
1. Watch the movie
The first step in writing the review is to watch the movie. Watch the movie in a relaxed environment you are familiar with. You do not want to be distracted by an unfamiliar room. Watching the movie a second time will help you absorb a lot more detail about the movie. Most movie reviewers take notes as they watch the movie review.英文影评范文精选15篇
2. Give your opinion
Most movie reviewers will give their opinion of the movie. This is important as the reviewer can express the elements of the movie they enjoyed or disliked. However, as in all good journalism, the reviewer should also give impartial details, and allow the reader to make their own mind over an issue the reader liked or disliked. Opinions should be explained to allow the reader to determine whether they would agree with your opinion .
Many regular movie reviewers will develop a following. If one can find a reviewer who shares a similar taste in films, one can confidently follow the reviewers recommendations.
3. Who is your audience?
You need to consider who your likely readers are. Writing a movie review for children requires a different approach than if writing for a movie club. Ensure you report on the factors that matter to your likely audience.
4. Give an outline
Give the outline of the movie, but dont give away essential details such as the end or any surprises. If there is a big surprise you want to entice readers by telling them something special happens, just dont say what.
5. Actors (演员)
If the movie contains actors, as most do, detail who is starring in the movie and how well you think they acted.
6. Structure
Did the movie follow a regular predictable story line, or did it get you thinking like a Quentin Tarantino movie?
and lighting (电影艺术和灯光效果)
Give details about how well the movie was shot and directed. Was the lighting good in the moody scenes?
8. Music
Did the movie have its own score like Koyaanisqatsi （失衡生活）or ET, or did it feature songs from popular artists?
9. Read, read and read
Read and check your review thoroughly. It can be embarrassing to find errors in your work after it has been published. This is especially important for reviews that will be published on the Internet, as search engines are always looking for the correct spellings of key words.
Submit your movie review
英文电影影评范文
侏罗纪公园3英文影评 Jurassic Park III(20_
^v^Jurassic Park III^v^ is neither as dreadful as it might be, nor as perfectly wrought as it could be. For one thing, it moves along as jauntily as one of those horrific raptors scooting along the plain; the movie wraps itself up so quickly, and after such a relatively low-key climax, that you can barely believe its over. It runs about 90 minutes, and thats sweet relief. You can get your fix of dino effects (most of which are starting to look pretty familiar anyway, after the original ^v^Jurassic Park^v^ and ^v^The Lost World: Jurassic Park^v^), with a few good jokes and interesting performances thrown in, and be on your way.
One of the best things about ^v^Jurassic Park III^v^ is that it brings back Sam Neill, who starred in the original, and hes a distinctly human and humane presence. As the movie opens, we see Neills adventuresome paleontologist, Dr. Alan Grant, playing with the toddler of his former collaborator Dr. Ellie Satler (Laura Dern, in a nicely played cameo), who has settled down with an earnest, unexciting husband and is quietly raising their two kids. Neill plays the scene英文影评范文精选15篇
beautifully: Hes half puzzled by the idea that anybody would want to settle down to a life like this, and half wistfully jealous that its just not for him.
He has no desire to see any more live dinosaurs up close and personal. Nonetheless, he and his young assistant Billy (Alessandro Nivola) are reluctantly roped into an adventure expedition to Isla Sorna (the ^v^Site II^v^ from ^v^The Lost World,^v^ where the prehistoric horrors were bred in a flagrant expression of human arrogance), by Amanda and Paul Kirby (Téa Leoni and William H. Macy), a rich couple hankering for danger.
Of course, they have another motive. But the bare-bones plot, from a script written by Peter Buchman, Alexander Payne (writer and director of ^v^Election^v^ and ^v^Citizen Ruth^v^) and Jim Taylor (who co-wrote those pictures with Payne), is probably the last reason anybody would go to see it. What most of us want are dinosaurs, and there are just the right number of those here, from a flock of fierce pterodactyl-like pteranodons with mischievously knowing eyes, to the dreaded raptors (who always look to me as if they should be dangling old-lady pocketbooks from their disproportionately smallish, curled-over front claws). Although its probably still too intense for very small children, ^v^Jurassic Park III^v^ features a blessed minimum of torso chewing. The worst part is watching one of the raptors use a giant toenail to puncture the spine of a minor character played by Michael Jeter -- hes too fine an actor to meet such a ignominious end. Another saving grace of ^v^Jurassic Park III^v^ is that it captures some of the wonder from the first picture. Director Joe Johnston (^v^Honey, I Shrunk the Kids,^v^^v^Jumanji^v^) is much more
low-key than his predecessor Steven Spielberg, who directed the first two pictures in the series. Thankfully, hes out to set us rambling and bumping on a scary-funny amusement park ride; he doesnt hammer on the whiskery old theme of man-playing-God, nor does he seem to take much pleasure in the requisite bloody chomping, even though he of course has to include some of it. And he offers us one extraordinary panorama that looks as if it had been lifted straight out of those softly colored educational picture books of the 50s and 60s, a group of peaceful
vegetarian apatosauruses against a purply pink Maxfield Parrish sky on the banks of a canal, chomping placidly on the plants they so love to eat. Dr. Grant and his group view the scene as they pass by it on a barge, and Neill plays the moment perfectly, like a man deep in love. Its as if a sight like this could make up for any number of dreadful dinosaur encounters.
The other actors here are just as game. As Eric, a kid whos been stranded on the island, Trevor Morgan shows the kind of appealing resourcefulness thats always fun for kids to watch. Macy is more than serviceable in a throwaway role: He manages to give his cowardly-lion character a great deal of charm and comic texture. Leoni does the best she can with her
character, but theres not much to work with: She doesnt get a chance to use her best gift, a flair for snappy, screwball-comedy timing that sparkled in her short-lived TV show ^v^The Naked Truth.^v^
Even so, Payne, Buchman and Taylor give us plenty of little things to laugh at along the way: Dr. Grant and Eric have a pleasingly tossed-off exchange as Grant incredulously holds up a bottle of T. Rex pee that Eric has collected. ^v^How did you get this?^v^ he demands. ^v^You dont wanna know,^v^ Eric deadpans ruefully. There are a few moments in the picture that are streaked with a sense of terror, scenes where you think the absolute worst is going to happen. But it never quite does. Theres a surprisingly delicate touch at work in ^v^Jurassic Park III,^v^ and the movie is marbled through with strands of acerbic wit. You might think that a filmmakers going to that much trouble in a ^v^Jurassic Park^v^ picture is like casting pearls before swine. What chance do pearls have under the feet of prehistoric giants? Miraculously, they survive the trampling intact, and theyre what you remember long after the last mighty footstep resonates.
英文影评范文精选15篇
篇一：影评写作格式
影评的格式和范文
模式一：单角度评析
题目：主标题
——副标题（主题思想、人物形象或者艺术手法）
第一段：电影风格（30字）+电影梗概（150字）+中心论点（20字）
第二段：分论点一
第三段：分论点二
第四段：总结（升华主题，并联系现实，提出个人思考）
模式二：多角度评析
题目：主标题
——副标题（不用提出角度，只需要点出评什么电影就可以了）
第一段：电影风格（30字）+电影梗概（150字）
第二段：评主题思想（看不出准确的主题思想，可以用感受来代替，但一定要结 合电影情节，不要写成纯观后感）
第三段：评人物形象（可以评一个，也可以评多个）
第四段：评艺术手法（镜头、音乐、台词、画面、色彩等等）
第五段：总结，提出一个总体的评价（弥补开始第一段的中心论点缺失）
模式三：散评式
题目：主标题
——副标题
也可以只用一个题目：比如说“评电影《花火》”
全文自由分段，想到哪儿写到哪儿，可以评价电影的任何一个部分或细节。
注意不要写成观后感，也不要写成电影简介，要注意“叙”“析”“评”相结合。篇二：影评范文
影评范文：（共五篇）
她是“法国中尉的女人”
——《法国中尉的女人》影评
在维多利亚时代，影像中的影像，她——萨拉，是“法国中尉的女人”。杂乱而干枯的头发，消瘦的锁骨，萨拉的出场足以让人跌破眼镜。繁忙的市场，波光粼粼的海，这样一个不修边幅的女人迎着呼啸海风，走向延伸到远方的海堤。初到林城的考古学家查尔斯就这样鬼使神差地被它吸引，放下娇美的未婚妻毅然冲了过去。水雾弥漫中，萨拉转身，查尔斯立定，画面定格，一瞬间的眼神交汇，不知从何而来的金光照亮了萨拉苍白的脸颊。电影史上最浪漫的一见钟情！阳光下的森林，浓郁的绿，闪烁的点点金黄，而人的再次相遇只是一场追逐的游戏。纵然是心中相爱，萨拉这样一个倔强的女子还是可悲的骄傲着。当他为生活所迫而拜访恶语相向想象的普太太，看似顺从，然则眼中尽是孤傲。孤傲，是孤独和骄傲，是在黑暗的房中抱着镜子做自画像，是她自暴自弃地说，“我和羞耻结合，羞耻让我活下去！我是法国中尉的^v^。”
但她更是一个因孤独而渴望爱的凡是女子。所以当她回忆那个带来羞辱的男人时，眼中人闪着爱的光芒。“他很俊俏，他赞美我美！”她嘴角含笑，温柔的抚摸着头、脸，沉浸在回忆中。因为爱，她不惜撒谎说自己已失身，以博取查尔斯的同情。因为爱，她会在孤立无援时求助查尔斯，却在查尔斯到来时徘徊与不安。因为爱，她与查尔斯在林中小屋情不自禁的拥吻，会心甘情愿地在伦敦小店与查尔斯结合。也因为爱，她扔下一句“是你给了我活下去的理由”，仍下决心一定的查尔斯，远走他乡。三年后，当查尔斯在一方宁静的村庄再见她时，已不见
影评范文英语8
认识《斗牛》这部影片还是同学介绍，说是不错，我就专门把它下载下来，并认真欣赏这部影片。感觉很不错，深深激起了我内心深处的共鸣。
一看到斗牛这两个字大家一定会联想到西班牙斗牛，但这部影片却不是西班牙的斗牛，而是纯中国版的“斗牛”，而且这部影片中的主角之一――牛，却是荷兰奶牛，题材新颖，打破了以往影片的传统。
这是一部以抗日战争为题材喜剧片，它反映中^v^民在^v^中的.不幸与所遭受的悲惨苦难，同时也反映了战争异常的残酷性。它是由我国著名导演管虎所导演，著名演员黄渤与燕妮共同主演的一部喜剧片，说是一部喜剧片，其中不乏有很多笑点，可是却无法让人眉开颜笑，原因就是它的场景太悲惨残酷了，而不禁地会让人惆怅起来。整部电影围绕着一头由国际友人赠送的荷兰奶牛展开的，真实的再现了抗日战争年代战火给中国人民带来的痛苦与不幸，让人深恶^v^主义给人民带来的深痛苦难与恶行，并充分展现了农民的卑微与朴实，同时反映了以男主人公为代表的广大农民的信誉。
虽然影片含有很多喜剧元素，却演绎出了中国三、四十年代最沉痛、最痛苦的那段历史。在影片中男主人公所住的整个村的人都被残忍的杀害了，只有男主人公与这头荷兰奶牛，这时的男主人公是孤独的，也是痛苦的，他所失去的不仅是与他朝夕相处的村民，他的那头老黄牛，他失去的还有他的挚爱――女主人公“九儿”，这正是他最痛苦的地方，为了这头“八路牛”，他失去了太多，但他还是坚持把这头“八路牛”成功从残忍的战火中解救出来并在与它朝夕相处的日子中培养出了深刻的情感，在这一方面有赖于这头牛不是一般的牛，而是能产奶的荷兰牛，另一方面是还有赖于男主人公的机智、勇敢与很好的信誉，没有这两方面的原因这头牛是不可能活这么长时间的。这时的男主人公与牛说话，在别人看来似乎就是对牛弹琴，但这时的主人公与牛已经远远超出了人与动物之间的一般关系，男主人公已经与牛之间生了深刻的感情，甚至已经到了分不开的地步了。从这个角度来看这也反映了战争时代中国农民的信誉，勇敢，敢于牺牲的爱国之情，从侧面也反映了日本鬼子的凶残。影片通过这些极为朴实的事例道出了一个意义深刻的道理，在这建国60周年之际，值得我们深思与学习，是献给祖国的最好的礼物。
这也是一部注重细节刻画的影片，在影片中我们可以看到破落的村庄，代表男女主人公爱情的银镯子，曾拯救过多人性命并经历过生死的奶牛都是导演所着重刻画出来的场景，打破了很多影片所体现出来的豪华阵容，在正方面我认为是一次创新，该影片虽然质朴但不乏教育意义，并能深深激起人们的爱国之情。
在影片最后男主人公意味深长的说出一句话：“别害怕，什么都能过去”，道明了只有活着才有可能取得最终的胜利，才能做很多有意义的事。如今的我们应该感到庆幸，因为我们的生活已不再有战争带来的苦难，不再有饥肠辘辘，不再有由于战争而失去亲人与爱人的痛苦。因此，我们通过观看这部电影在深刻感受到70多年前民族的伤痛的同时，也更应该珍惜今天的和平、幸福的生活。也更应该保留在影片中男主人公所体现的坚守承诺的精神！
影评范文英语9
十六世纪前，自香水被意大利人创造后，它之于绝大部分人只是纯粹的动词，一个吸引人并陶醉人的动词。但对于让-巴蒂斯特？格雷诺耶，一个气味天才，却是和“存在”相同的名词。
格雷诺耶的诞生除开死神的意愿显然还带了讽刺的意味。他的童年，没有爱，只有流离辗转和挤落。他渴望爱，却得不到爱，甚至无法遇见爱。但气味却让他体验一派生机勃勃，领悟生活的喜悦。于是他凭这巴黎最灵敏的鼻子捕捉它、创造它，构筑自己的王国，为之开疆拓土。
尔后的际遇更使他不得不琢磨自己存在的价值。他当然清楚自己扮演的角色――像扁虱一样渺小地存在，毫不起眼；而他只消情迷于自己创建的气味王国。
萨特说“存在先于本质。”由此不过是本能的求生欲望驱使他小心翼翼，如履薄冰。如此，他才能存在于这世界，才能选择自己的行为。这时格雷诺耶对于“存在”的意义还很模糊。“存在”对他来说和“生存”没多大区别。他所考虑的仅仅是自己如何在这弱肉强食的世界中活下来，不至出局。关于香水的梦想也只是基于“活着”的上一层建筑。对格雷诺耶来讲，这比探究“存在”显得更加现实。
他情愿避开人类，这压抑了十八年的人的气味，一种臭味，终于得以化解。他孤独，仍寻求孤独。独自一人让他无比宽心，安全、自由，不提防、无仇恨。
这个国家最远的火山无人问津，它纯洁、干净。他迷恋它，留恋它。七年，他栖息于此，彻底远离人的气味。但当他发现他自己根本没有气味时，恐慌，如空气将他包裹。在格雷诺耶的气味王国里，一切都应该有气味。但是他没有。
西方哲学家认为存在就是被感知，无法被感知的事物（包括被神感知），就无法证明其存在。对格雷诺耶来说，他自己就是不存在的。他的王国里一切都有意义，但这个创建者――他自己――却没有，或根本不存在。他不存在，那么他无法给自己下定义，他什么都不是，他无法成为这样或那样的人。
于是他制作了一种模仿人的气味的香水，第一次传播人的气息。他成功了，骗过了所有人。他不再是那个擦身而过却毫不在意的人，也不是相视而笑后转头即忘的人。只是一种气味，便将他的邪恶、阴险完美地隐藏在人群中。
略施手段就让自以为是的人们上了大当，在他看来，人不过是愚蠢的动物，其他什么都不是。他们凭呼吸思考，而气味却同呼吸捆绑一起。气味能够刺激神经将其和感情或者经历联系在一起，以影响人的心理和生理。格雷诺耶认为只要控制人的呼吸，便可控制人心。人的气味远远无法满足他，他要超越它。他要制作一种香水，一种凌驾于任何气味的香水，这种香水使人入迷甚至激发爱欲。而他，就是这种香味的载体。
对于这种香味他再无法忍受只能存于记忆。他要占有，哪怕最终失去。这香水，需要等待、需要雕琢、需要牺牲。
对于后者，他毫不在乎，反觉理所当然。根据弗洛伊德的陈述，格雷诺耶的行事规则几乎即是本我的“快乐原则”。绝世的香味使他获得满足感，同时激起他从未有过的爱欲；以这香味为主体的香水又是他证明自己存在，并折服众人的关键。这是他所有行为的直接动机，也是欲望的源泉。而“自我”不过是处理他在达成目的过程中与外界规范发生冲突时的协调机制。他不喜与人交往，却游刃其间；他尽量避开人类，只当他的目标存在不得不跨越的鸿沟时，方与人磨合。
香水的代价是25名少女花一般的生命。她们被摘掉时，香味在最全盛的时刻凝成点滴的精华。正如格雷诺耶构想的那样，香水激发了人类灵魂里最原始的爱欲。这一刻，在万人面前，他确实证明自己真的存在了，因为众人正深深地爱着他，神化着他。他应该满足还是狂喜？不，他反而嘲笑和憎恨。他的目的确已达到，人们臣服于他伟大的香水，宣布他的无罪与神圣。但与其说人们爱上他，不如说爱上这种香味。除却表层的浮华，暴露的还是那个丑陋、无味的内里。他创造了这情愫，如今恨不得摒弃它。他们因香水而爱他，而他对他们丝毫没有爱，只有恨。但无论他怎样恨他们，在香水的作用下，他们只能爱他。
格雷诺耶得不到真实的感情，更无法容许它虚假的存在。凭这香水，他可以为所欲为，但他反觉已钻进了死胡同，前方再无路可走。于是他回到巴黎，在全年最热的一天，像他出生时一样，所有臭味以最大程度传播，以这香水的慑力结束他的生命。
少时的经历对一个人一生的塑造作用极大。格雷诺耶后来的排斥、憎恨，以及对这个世界的诸多疑惑与这段时期的惨淡生活不无关系。他的一生充斥了数不尽的矛盾与冲突。他渴望爱，却无法享用，绝望后他将对爱的追求转化为对人类的憎恨。他本身没有气味（尽管一开始他浑然不知），却对气味情有独钟。他厌恶人的气味，却仍渴望拥有它，像个正常人，于是他仿制这种气味。当他带着上帝赐予的天赋和撒旦赠与的灵感^v^于世时，他决心用香水愚弄、报复所有人，却仍无法像个常人般爱与被爱。
在他的一套气味理论中，格雷诺耶一直试着向自己解答一个问题，即“我是否存在”。但他无法解答，直到最后仍在困惑。他从扁虱开始，逐渐成为旁人心中一个伟大的存在，却最终无法被自己接受，归于往来的尘土。
影评范文英语10
Au printemps 1949, Clément Mathieu est nommé surveillant d'une école appelée «fond de l'étang», où vivaient de nombreux garçons difficiles. Il a utilisé de son talent musical et son cœur chaleureux et bienveillant pour apporter le printemps dans la vie des garçons.
En contraste frappant avec le directeur impitoyable, grincheux et égoïste, M. Mathieu a dissous la glace et les malentendus entre les garçons et les enseignants et a fait ressortir la bonne volonté des garçons rebelles. Au lieu de succomber à leurs méfaits et de résoudre les problèmes par la violence et punitions sévères, M. Mathieu a exploité le potentiel du chant des garçons et a vécu avec eux en harmonie après des grands efforts. Au final, ses efforts ont payé parce que sa chorale a été reconnue par la fondation.
Bi
